| The mention of head lice in
either casual or academic circles often elicits a knee-jerk response. Reports about some
people reacting in panic to finding head lice on their children have also resulted in some
commentators reacting narrowly and concluding that the parental response to lice is a
misinformed (and therefore correctable) overreaction to a relatively minor problem. Many years ago, it was pointed out that, though the
human louse (Pediculus humanus) does not make up a large group and is not an
extremely complex insect in itself, the study of its relationship with its host is
involved and is influenced very much by individual variations in, and complex behaviours
of, humans [Ferris 1935, Buxton 1941].
Moreover, it stands out for its role in human
health. The human louse can carry diseases which have had such a devastating impact on
human populations that they have possibly shaped the human race - biologically with regard
to hairlessness [Rantala 1999] and culturally with regard to civilised hygienic practices
[Nuttall 1918]. However, there are no direct reports connecting isolated scalp
infestations with louse borne disease carriage in modern, hygienic surroundings.
Thus, some people have
relegated pediculosis capitis to the trivial illness basket.
Pediculosis capitis has become one of,
if not the most, prevalent childhood communicable condition and is causing financial and
health-related problems for families worldwide. Well over several million dollars annually
are spent on lice control in each of the USA, the UK and Australia. The application of
pediculicides on a growing population of lice has, in some areas, exhausted the available
range of insecticides to which they were once susceptible.
Treatment is a labour intensive task, with
work and family time put on hold. Some people eliminate infestation in the family without
dramas; e.g., clipper haircuts for boys make removal of this external parasite a
non-event. However for others, sensitive scalps or some hair textures can make manual
methods difficult, and it only takes one resistant infection to cause undue hardship.
The obvious rise in head lice in
schoolchildren in only a couple of decades has led to many families catching lice, not
once but repeatedly over the years while their children progress through childcare
centres, preschool and school. Busy families nurturing babies and young children have the
least time available for the time-consuming, sometimes distressing, process of physically
checking for and removing lice.
Devoted parents put a lot of effort
into nursing their children back to good health, whatever the presenting illness. They
will resort to a one-off haircut and/or weeks of intensive combing to cure lice once and
for all. However, they are utterly frustrated at the prospect of no end to this
disruption. Without higher management, their recently cleared children are exposed to
further carriers when they return to school, where they must attend but where parents have
no control over their contacts.
Understanding the human host and
parasite factors that influence diagnosis and treatment is the key to solving the head
lice problem. The consistent thrust of control policies since the 1980s has been to
motivate and educate, with the worthwhile aim of empowering families to detect and cure
lice, but with little or no professional monitoring. The problem with this is that
underdiagnosis is common because detection in the hair is more complex than previously
thought.
We do not deny that many people, armed with
knowledge of head lice and their practical treatment, can do much to safely control their
own lice. However, the rising prevalence of head lice infestation in schoolchildren and
recent scientific findings by Bailey and Prociv, in particular regarding louse appearance
and hair factors, support the contention that education of parents alone, without enforced
screenings of populations at risk, will fail to halt the spiralling transmission.
The primary reservoir for head lice has
been confirmed. The coming together of children in large numbers, in most societies in
preschools and schools, facilitates the spread of lice. Their natural contact with
multiple classmates is unavoidable. However, head lice is completely curable in the
individual. For some, it will take a caring health professional to recognize a relapsing
condition and demonstrate ways to tackle the missed lice.
Were it not for uncured carriers, the
general community for whom the majority have never had lice would otherwise never be
exposed to this communicable parasitosis. More effective louse management is needed to
halt what is a preventable communicable disease problem. Investment in time-honoured
strategies aimed at louse eradication may save far more costs for the community in the
long-run.
| (Adapted from conference
proceedings of the Second International Conference on Phthiraptera 2002: presentation on
findings from research on louse diagnosis, community transmission and treatment by A. M.
Bailey) |
|