|
Shortly
after we purchased our caravan we put it on a weighbridge only to find that
without any personal property and with water tanks empty it was only 120 Kg
below the ATM figure on the compliance plate. Just filling the water
tanks would put us 20 Kg over the legal limit.
The figures on the compliance plate showed the ATM was very conservative, it
was simply the factory Tare before they fitted the battery, battery charger, solar panel, inverter,
microwave, 2x9Kg gas bottles plus the arbitrary 300Kg allowance for water
and personal gear.
The axle/suspension/tyre rating on the compliance plate showed the ATM could
have been 150Kg higher.
The photo below is
from
Stewarts Super-Flex Suspension Systems
brochure.

Discussion with the manufacturer to have this remedied were completely
fruitless. Even the intervention of a suitably qualified and accredited
mechanical engineer who agreed with my intentions failed to sway the
manufacturer.
The engineer, not prepared to overturn the manufacturers specifications,
advised our only option was to upgrade the suspension, drawbar and chassis
to justify re-rating the figures. I guess his reluctance was,
understandably, concern of legal action should things go pear shaped at
later stage.
After much research, I settled on the
Stewarts Super-Flex Suspension Systems
product, who's largest
model was rated at 2600Kg at 50% spring compression and came with University
test figures. What I didn't know then was these tests were pertaining
to the fibreglass spring only
(which I have had no trouble with at all), not the entire unit.
So I duly purchased and fitted the Stewart suspension, rated as above, and
from another supplier, a
50mm square axle complete with electric brakes, six stud drums, HD wheel
bearings (same inner & outer bearings) rated at 2000Kg SWL.
In addition, the drawbar was reinforced with a 50mm x 8mm tension strap and
an added chassis reinforcement where the new suspension was fitted.
This also had the additional benefit of raising the caravan an additional
100mm.
All modifications were done under the direction of the engineer and duly
inspected and certified prior to re-registration.
Several
months later and only two weeks into our first trip in this caravan, near
disaster struck.
The photo on the left shows a total separation of the left hand side swing arm from the axle clamp due to metal fatigue adjacent to the weld. Since the fibre glass spring is a slipper arrangement only, this left the entire axle and wheel assembly attached to the caravan by the right hand side
swing arm only.
This photo was taken prior to removal from the caravan and shows the axle is
(fortunately) wedged forward of its original position between the chassis
mounted spring and what is left of the swing arm.
It was only by incredible good luck that the left hand side of the axle / wheel assembly didn't drag back and under the caravan, lifting the caravan and steering it to the left, which would have resulted in an almost certain roll over.
This failure occurred only 3 months and 2,400Km after fitting. The load rating is comfortably within the manufacturers specifications and the installation was inspected and certified by an approved automotive engineer prior to
re-registration as previously mentioned.
Hairline fractures in the opposite side point to imminent failure of that
side as well.
Several phone calls from Victoria where we were stranded to Mr Stewart of Stewarts Super-Flex Suspension Systems in Qld and
he agreed to send me
what turned out to be a one off redesigned replacement swing
arms. The modifications incorporated significant changes and substantial
strengthening
that I had demanded during the phone calls. (During these phone
conversations I found that this problem had occurred before but he claimed
to have fixed it by merely relocating the galvanising vent holes.)
These parts were couriered to us several days later. Repeated
attempts to contact Mr Stewart over a period of several days concerning some
fitting problems were unsuccessful.
Even a friend back home who tried to call on Mr Stewart for me found his business
premises closed and other businesses adjoining Stewarts reported he had been
closed for nearly a week.
The new replacement parts were subsequently fitted by a local firm and
28,000 Km later, we have had no further
trouble.
On returning home two months later, I again repeatedly tried to contact Mr
Stewart, but all I could find out from other businesses in the vicinity was
that he had closed up the same week that I had my problem.
I have to this day never been able to contact Mr
Stewart. Where are you Mr Stewart ? you
have a responsibility to to me and to all who purchased your product and who
may be trying to make a claim on your 2 year warranty.
Discussions following subsequent inspections by professional repairers and fabricators in this field lead me to believe, in the absence of input from the
manufacturer that,
this failure was inevitable and due to fundamental design flaws.
Problem is, Mr Stewart sold many of these suspension systems and to my
knowledge my replacement one was
the only one to have been supplied without this potentially fatal flaw.
The problem with the original design is that the swing arms clamp tightly around the
axle. If the both swing arms rose and fell in unison, there
would be no problem but of course this does not happen in practice.
When only one swing arm rises or falls in relation to the other, there is a simultaneous pivoting and
twisting force applied to the axle. Since the axle is a
solid 50mm square section and the swing arm is only a 50mm x 2.5mm square
tube section, it forces the swing arm to constantly flex causing rapid
failure.
The fix for this problem was to redesign the clamp end so that there is just
sufficient clearance to allow the axle to twist and pivot freely thereby not
placing any strain on the swing arm.
Relative movement between clamp and axle is small but enough to prevent the
problem.
In addition to this, the swing arm was constructed from 4mm wall tubing with
extra gussets connecting the swing arm to the clamp.
As a precaution the swing arm tube is sealed and to check the integrity of
the assembly, the swing arms can be pressurised to test for fractures via a permanently
fitted Schrader valve and pressure switch.
Five years and 38,000 Km later, I have not had any further problems and no wear
of moving parts (clamp & axle) is evident.
The fibreglass spring itself has never caused any problems and provides
excellent springing characteristics similar to a coil spring but without the
long term sagging problems. It has the additional benefit of
being non-linear in compression, initially soft but stiffening up
considerably as compression increases. |