This page will take several minutes to load if you have a dial-up
connection.
This page first appeared on this web site in June 2004.
It was revised and updated in Mar 2008
For quite some time I have wanted to build an absolute minimum size
caravan with accommodation for two.
The main motivation is the desire to have high mobility with much better
off road ability and durability than your average caravan but for ease of
use and security we did not want a canvas based camper trailer nor any
form of folding caravan (eg A-'van)
With the recent increases in fuel cost and the inevitable continuation of
this trend, we have again looked at the possibilities. ( For diesel
we were paying $0.64 per litre in 2000, $1.75 in March '08, $2 per litre
fuel is almost here and $3 per litre is just around the corner.)
I first conceived of this adaptation of the slideon idea over thirty years
ago but a succession of boats, campervans and caravans meant it never came
to fruition. I started giving it more serious thought about five
years ago during one caravanning trip when we couldn't get the caravan in
one or two camping spots we fancied. But now the time is
right and I plan to commence building this slideon camper/caravan "in
a couple of months time".
(The "slideon" name originated back in the '60s to describe a
caravan type that was slid on to a small tray top vehicle or "ute".
Here I am just using it as a generic name to describe a caravan without
wheels that is placed on a vehicle, in this case a small 7'x4' box
trailer.) |
What is described below more resembles a camping trailer but it is a true
caravan since all accommodation and facilities are contained within
without resorting to any fold out or canvas sections (except for the pop
top roof).
The aim is to be totally independent and self supporting in isolated areas
for at least a week.
The design criteria are as follows...
| * |
Sleeping accommodation for
two. |
| * |
Absolute minimum frontal area.
Maximum towing height
including solar panel must be less than 2.1M.
(Want to negotiate height barriers in car parks etc.) |
| * |
ATM (mass loaded) not to exceed
1000 Kg (750 Kg for the trailer slideon camper.) |
| * |
Seating for
two. |
| * |
Must have
s/s sink and 2 burner stove with grill (Maxie or Origo metho
(alcohol) type - we are ex-boaties). |
| * |
Must have 50 Lit compressor
fridge. |
| * |
Must have adequate on
board storage for battery, inverter, generator and outside fold up
table and chairs. |
| * |
Minimum 70 lit water tank. |
| * |
Must have a small enclosed
loo. |
| * |
80W minimum solar panel on roof. |
|
|
I have been thinking
about this for quite some time and in the last couple of years I
have been doodling various designs with the aid of 2D cad software
that I have been using for years.
It started off as a slideon camper for our 7'x4' galvanised box
trailer and soon turned into a stand alone little caravan 2.5M x
1.7M. The reason being, I just wasn't satisfied
that everything on my "must have" list was fitting
satisfactorily into the slideon.
My slideon design used a full size front hinged pop-top whereas the
little caravan had a smaller full lifting pop-top.
Both used bunk beds, one above the other and a rear door, this is
the only way I could see to keep the width down while incorporating
all the features we wanted.
As it turns out, the toilet compartment is almost as large as the
shower/toilet in our Golf Bushman
(although head room is restricted) and the front storage area volume
is similar.
Beds are 1900 x 650mm each.
Wardrobe / drawers W=480mm x D=600mm x H=1400mm
Bench space with sink & stove 1200mm x 470mm
Head room with roof up 1.6 M lowest to 2.1 M highest at the rear.
The overall length of the camper excluding the draw bar, front
storage box and spare tyre is 2.45 M.
It's surprising what you can comfortably fit in a small space by
reclaiming the floor space of one bed.

There is ample seating for two, the top bunk hinges down to become
the backrest for the bottom bunk along the left side of the
camper. Also on the left side at the rear is the wardrobe.
On the right hand side at the rear is a stove with fridge underneath
and a next to that is sink with a cupboard underneath. At the
rear is an enclosed toilet and hand basin.
Underneath the lower bunk is stowage for the annex and outside table
and chairs and a sealed 12V battery forward.
Initial calculations indicate an unladen mass of 820 Kg so I would
have to refine the design a little to keep the laden mass below the
target 1000 Kg.
|

|
The
above drawing is the original design first published on
this
web site in June 04. |
Then
just recently, mainly due to the use of some new 3D modeling
software, I have come a full circle in both design and construction
method.
I modeled both of my concepts, the stand alone mini caravan and the
trailer mounted caravan/camper.
In a "walk through" of both the virtual caravan and camper
I was convinced that this concept and layout would be quite
practical and would fulfill all my criteria even better than I had
expected.
After two years of contemplating and doodling I am now thinking that
my original slide-on concept is going to be quite adequate for our
needs, quite a bit simpler and cheaper to build with no annual rego
to worry about.
There was so little difference between the two that I have opted for
the trailer mounted caravan/camper.
The only significant difference is the camper sits on a 7' x
4' box trailer, is 250Kg lighter, has a full pop top and a
smaller water storage capability of 85 litres.
This interior design and layout is virtually identical in that it
still has two bunk beds, an enclosed loo, a bench top for sink and
stove and a 50 litre Waeco fridge/freezer.
|
|
|
The
illustration
on the left gives an idea of my 2nd generation mini caravan design
with an ATM (all up mass) calculated to be 1000Kg.
I persevered with this design for quite some time until the
advent of some 3D modeling software that convinced me that the
trailer slideon was just as "roomy" and far easier and
cheaper to build and own.
In my 08 rewrite of this page, I have deleted most of the info
pertaining to this version but even though concept and
construction are different, layout is all but identical to the
current slideon version.
|
The advantage of this slide-on over the mini caravan - simpler
construction, lighter, no engineering certificates needed and no
additional annual registration fees.
Originally the idea was that it should be suitable for frequent shorter
duration trips, we were looking at trips up to a week duration and into
areas not suitable for full sized caravans.
Now we are hoping it will be a replacement for our Golf Bushman where we
do trips ranging from a couple of weeks to a couple of months especially
when used with the annex described below.
The slideon camper offers better accommodation than a typical HiAce / VW
size campervan and the tow vehicle & camper combination has
considerably better off road ability and much better driver/passenger
collision safety than the typical forward control van conversions.
This one would slide on to our galvanised 2100 x 1200 mm (7' x 4')
box trailer.
The trailer has an unladen mass of 250 Kg including a spare tyre and
maximum loaded 750Kg, the legal limit for an unbraked trailer.
The overall length of the camper (excluding draw bar) is 2.44 M, width is
1.68 M and height is 2.0 M and with the pop top up is 2.5 M.
Interior headroom is 1.5 M with the roof down to >1.9 M over the
standing area with the roof up.
Suspension is the usual leaf sprung beam axle and 195R14LT
tyres rated at 960Kg each.
I know an all up mass of 750 Kg is a lot for something so small compared
to a commercially built caravan but I want this to be very rugged to
reliably go
almost anywhere the 4x4 can.
It is not intended to be hard core bush bashing camper, even your average
well built box trailers are just not suitable for that kind of punishment
without extensive modifications, but it will enable us to venture into
areas out of reach of most caravans.
Even now we can venture into almost all camping areas we choose with our Golf
Bushman, this one would enable us to go even further.
I have two options for the construction.
Either it could be constructed of aluminium square tube (not "C"
section like most caravans) with aluminium exterior and plywood interior.
Or, far simpler to build, 10mm marine
plywood lower section and 6mm marine ply with 0.8mm prepainted stucco
aluminium outer skin bonded directly to the ply top sides with no framing,
relying on the interior furniture as structural elements.
The roof in both cases
would be an aluminium/3mm ply/HD foam/3mm ply laminate.
After a lot of thought, I have opted for
the aluminium frame construction, mainly so that I could more easily
insulate the camper, in this case with 25mm of polystyrene foam.
The trailer would
undergo a couple of minor modifications, lengthened and strengthened
"A" frame and replacement of the ball coupling with a
Tregg or preferably Orac type, as shown on the left, to give
the degree of articulation needed for more difficult terrain.
Something this small can't be made to look streamlined and stylish
so I am quite happy to make it look like a camping trailer without
trying at all to make it look like a caravan hence, by necessity,
the simple to build space efficient boxy shape.
I am struggling to get down to my target of 500 Kg for the loaded
slide-on by the time I included water, battery, solar panel, fridge,
generator, annex, toilet and personal effects etc. whilst
maintaining desired strength.
If I do exceed the magic 750 Kg all up, it means fitting
brakes to the trailer (which I probably would do anyway if this
project proved to be as successful as I hoped).
A couple of you emailed me suggesting moulded fibreglass but I
prefer aluminium and plywood for a number of reasons, not the least
of which is ease of construction for a one-off
project. To use moulded fibreglass, you need
a mould and to get the mould you must first build a "plug"
and the end result would be double the weight or ten times the cost
if the weight and strength were the same as the marine ply or
aluminium framed construction.
The screened door, windows and 85 lit water tank are all stock off the
shelf items.
I tried dozens of variations in the front to try to give it a more
streamlined appearance but none looked quite right so I will stick with the
basic box shape. In any case, I don't think any variations of the frontal
area that would be practical will cause much if any reduction in drag
since it is almost completely in the slipstream of the tow vehicle.
The accommodation, while certainly not palatial, would be quite
adequate for us.
The table at the end of this page is a comparison of the calculated
performance of our present Golf Bushman and the proposed mini van
and slide-on.
Based on those figures I would be hoping for 8.5 to 9.0 Km/Lit, up
from the present 6.0 to 6.5 Km/Lit, a significant reduction in fuel
consumption in the order of better than 40%. Wind
resistance due to frontal area is the main enemy.
The advantage of this type of pop top roof compared to a fully
elevating pop top is ease of use and better strength to weight
ratio. The biggest disadvantage of this type of pop-top roof is the solar panel
angle, OK if I always park facing north. May have to either hinge
the panel or relocate it.
Clearly this type and size
caravan/camper isn't for everyone, but for us, it's advantages should weigh it's
disadvantages.
Loading and unloading the camper from the trailer.
To load and unload the camper from the trailer shouldn't be too
difficult.
The principle here is based on the fact that as you raise and lower
the front of the trailer with the jockey wheel, the body of the
trailer will pivot about the axle. A weight bias ahead
of the axle is assumed and of course, stable towing would mandate
this in any case.
Imagine the slideon camper in position on the trailer, now wind the
jockey wheel so the front is lowered and the rear, conversely, is
raised.
Now fit two (removable) legs at the rear of the slideon of such a
length that they contact the ground.
Now wind the jockey wheel so as to now raise the front, the rear of
the trailer will drop leaving the rear of the slideon supported only
on the removable legs (and the front still on the front of the
trailer).
Now place two more removable legs at the now raised front of the
slideon and then level the trailer.
The slideon should now be supported solely by the four legs at a
height above the trailer determined by the range of movement of the
jockey wheel.
(25mm of clearance would be ideal and easily obtainable, much more
and you would have to start thinking about slightly reducing the
floor length of the camper inside the trailer to avoid the problem
of trailer & front of camper contact when loading/unloading.)
Loading is the reverse.
In practice, the legs would need to be "L" shape such that
the (front) legs are sufficiently clear the trailer wheel guards to
allow extricating the trailer.
Some 35x35x2mm steel should be adequate for the four legs (they are
only around 500mm long x 300mm to form the "L").
Permanent sockets with 35x35mm id could be fitted under the
"wings" to receive the legs. At around
5.5Kg total, it would be feasibly to carry these legs in case needed
while you are away.
An advantage of this method is that you are only lifting the front
of the slideon and that is with the aid of the jockey wheel so the
whole operation shouldn't require much
effort. That's my theory
anyhow. If I'm wrong I'm sure someone will let me
know.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We
found very early in our caravanning that an outside awning
of some description with at least one wall, preferably two,
is essential and even more so with this tiny caravan.
The intention
would be to use the Oztent model RV-3 as an annex to give
some more living space on anything longer than an overnight
stop as shown in the graphic on the right.
We envision purchasing the optional side walls to enclose
the awning as well, giving quiet a roomy living space when
needed (which I have not shown). |
 |
|
|
We recently did a 6,000Km trip with the same 7'x4' trailer which was
fitted with a removable metal canopy that I built a couple of years
ago. This canopy is 1.35M wide, only 300mm less than the
proposed camper and same height and same anticipated overall loaded
weight.
For one 1537 Km section we used 162 lit of diesel while driving for economy, compare
this to towing the Golf Bushman at the same speed and in the same conditions .
. .
|
Km/Lit |
Lit/100Km |
MPG
(Imperial) |
| Trailer
with canopy |
9.5 |
10.54 |
26.8 |
| Golf
Bushman |
6.5 |
15.40 |
18.4 |
In view of this, a fuel consumption of
9 Km/Lit (11 Lit/100Km) that I had hoped for looks quite realistic.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Some rough calculations
| Approximate
calculated performance data |
Present
Tow Vehicle
Max Power = 84 kW
Vehicle mass = 2400Kg |
Golf
Bushman |
Proposed
Mini Van |
Proposed
Mini
Slide-on |
| Caravan
Mass ATM (loaded) |
1850 Kg |
<1000 Kg |
750 Kg |
| Combined
Mass |
4250 Kg |
3400 Kg |
3150 Kg |
kW required
to maintain
100 kph |
70.5 kW |
42.3 kW |
41.2 kW |
| Max
speed |
107 kph |
131 kph |
132 kph |
Max
speed
10% grade |
52 kph |
64 kph |
68 kph |
Max speed
15 kph head wind |
92 kph |
116 kph |
117 kph |
Max speed
15 kph head wind
& 5% grade |
60 kph |
77 kph |
80.5 kph |
| Approximate
comparative
dimensions |
| Length
(less drawbar) |
4.8 M |
2.50 M |
2.44 M |
| Width |
2.2 M |
1.75 M |
1.68 M |
| Height |
2.6 M |
2.05M |
2.0 M to 2.5
M |
| Frontal
area |
5.10
M2 |
3.05
M2 |
2.90
M2
|
|
PS
This is an American idea of a compact caravan, the TrailManor (http://www.trailmanor.com/)
very clever design but hardly compact by our standards.

|
|