
|
home hillary battlestar clothing competition campaign tshirts buttons past >>> scrapbook links contact
|
![]() back to index
Past Issues: Issue#8 May 2006
Women in the Funeral Service Women in the Olympics Rethinking Obesity: Have our cake and eat it Campaign Update: The Greens enter the debate ![]()
A Women’s Place is in the home: The Directory of Women in Trades & Services lists Victorian women skilled in male dominated trades. In the Introduction to the second edition, the editors confirmed that there was 'a need that was not being filled – a wish by consumers to have a choice to employ women to do the work in their homes and businesses'. For some, the choice to employ women was part of redressing past discrimination of tradeswomen and encouraging more to enter these types of jobs. Other reasons for employing women seemed based on the assumption that women could provide certain services better than men; women in trades were safer, cleaner and listened to their customers better. Although the increase of women in male dominated jobs is a positive step in redressing past discrimination, prescribing certain attributes to women reinforces stereotypes that limit women's full participation in society. In the example of women funeral home directors, female stereotypes are used to market a particular quality of service that reinforces the traditional view of women as emotional care givers. The rise of women funeral home directors, particularly those staffed entirely by women, is a recent phenomenon and is marked in the National Pioneering Women's Hall of Fame website. As well as founding the first all-women staffed funeral home in Australian in 1989, Mareena Purslowe is recognized as the first woman awarded title of Master Funeral Director by Australian Funeral Directors Association in 2002. Her WA business, Mareena Purslowe and Associates, has a website with pictures of women doing a variety of activities such as riding a motorbike, playing golf, and abseiling. Purslowe's image is one of female independence yet this idea is subtle. Although she acknowledges that her business is staffed by women, she does not claim that her gender is her best qualification. In contrast, White Lady Funerals has capatalised on an all-women approach. The idea of women as emotional care givers is explicit; the organisation's motto reads 'a woman's understanding', suggesting an innate compassion held only by half the sexes. The last sentence of the White Lady mission statement reinforces this stereotype and reminds the reader that 'our families are our highest priority'.
Unlike the active images of women from Mareena Purslowe's website, the White Lady is an Australian version of the Stepford wives. Their trademark white uniform, white hearse, white roses, is offset with a touch of burgundy. Although their white clothing may distinguish them from the classic black suited funeral director, it does not make them individuals. Instead, their costume is a marker, like a scene from the Handmaid's Tale, it signifies their role. Although the most distinct, White Lady is not alone in claiming that women have a unique approach to funeral care. Louise King Funerals, has as its motto, 'special care that only women can give'. A division of Kings Australia, Louise King is not a truly independent funeral home, but part of a growing number of homes that have all- women offshoots. On their website, the introduction of Louise King funeral homes is explained as part of Kings Australia 'response to a growing worldwide preference for the softer, gentler approach that female funeral directors can give.' Yet these offshoots appear more of a specialty service, rather than a mainstream shift to have women working in a male-dominated workplace. Frances Tobin is linked from the main webpage of the Tobin Brothers Funerals chain under the listing of 'ethnic and specialist services'. In her picture, she stands amongst men of different ethnic backgrounds such as Italian, Vietnamese, and Indian. Here, Tobin Brothers present women as another minority group who speak their own language, one that some people 'simply feel more comfortable talking.' Such stereotypes are not helpful to the advancement of women because rarely are these ideas valued. From the right to vote, to women's continued discrimination in the Australian Defence Force, the idea that women are innately more emotional and caring has pushed women into secondary roles. Although feminism has fought to give value to women's historical role as care givers, these labels should not be used to promote business. Not only do they affect other aspects of women's advancement, but all-women funeral directors become novelty items. Rather than truly integrating into male-dominated trades, they have been given a job that is better suited to their nature. Proof of this can already be seen in the latest edition of the Directory of Women in Trades & Services, where funeral directors have been taken out entirely. Moreover, these stereotypes reinforce roles for all genders; women will continue to be carers, while men will continue to get on with the real work of running the world. ![]()
The Strange History of Women at the Modern Olympics: One would be wrong, however, to disdain croquet. It develops a combinative mind, one has only to see it transform young girls into reasoners and from reasoners into reasonable people. The Official Report of the Paris Games, 1900 The practice of sport is a human right. Every individual must have the possibility of practicing sport, without discrimination of any kind and in the Olympic spirit, which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play. Olympic Charter, 2004 When the dream of Baron de Coubertin was realized with the first modern Olympics Games in 1896, there were no official female participants in the events held in Athens. History records that Spiridon Louis won the marathon and became a legend on April 10. Lesser known is the fact that a woman named Melpomene had run the distance from Marathon to Athens a month earlier, finishing in four and a half hours. She tried to sign up for the actual race, but was rejected by the race commissioners. The first official female athletes at the Olympics were entrants in the genteel sports of tennis, croquet and golf at the 1900 Paris Olympic Games. The first female champion was five times Wimbledon winner, Charlotte Cooper in singles tennis. Champion women in the Olympic competition have included major stars of the game including Dorothea Lambert Chambers, Suzanne Lenglen, Helen Wills Moody, Steffi Graf, Jennifer Capriati, Lindsay Davenport, Venus Williams and Justine Henin-Hardenne. Their stature in the game has often exceeded the gold medal winning men such as Marc Rosset and Nicolas Massu. The number of women remained low even though they were allowed to compete in archery (1908), swimming and diving (1912) and fencing (1924) from a relatively early stage. Typical of the discrimination that women faced is the example of Sarah ‘Fanny’ Durack and Wilhelmina ’Mina’ Wylie, Australia’s entrants in the 100 metres freestyle in Stockholm. Swimming authorities considered it an absurd waste of money to send female athletes across the world to the Olympics in 1912, so both swimmers had to rely on family, friends and fundraising in order to go. Unsurprisingly they overcame the hurdles of petty officialdom and finished first and second respectively, with Durack breaking the world record in the second round of races. Women’s events were finally added to the iconic Olympic sports of athletics and gymnastics at the 1928 Amsterdam Games after a number of separate international women’s games had been held earlier that decade. Almost immediately there was controversy in the male-dominated discipline of track and field. Reportedly the predominately male spectators at the 100 metres final were shocked when the Canadian trio of “Bobbie” Rosenfeld, Ethel Smith and Myrtle Cook hugged and kissed prior to the race. Even more damaging to the cause of women’s sport, was the fact that competitors in the 800 metres collapsed from exhaustion when they crossed the finish line. This is so commonplace with athletes of both sexes that it goes unremarked these days, but in 1928 was seen as an example of women’s unsuitability for endurance events. Henri, Come de Baillet-Latour, President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), suggested banning all women from all events in a return to the ideals of the ancient Greeks. It should be noted that the ancient Greeks, apart from the Spartans, kept their own women (except slaves and prostitutes) suitable cloistered away from all public life. While this suggestion wasn’t acted upon, women were banned from running events of more than 200 metres (a half lap) until 1960! In the men’s events at the same Olympics the ‘Flying Finns’ were dominating distance running, happily winning the 3,000 metres steeplechase, as well as the 5,000 metres and 10,000 metres. No doubt they exhibited some fatigue after their races. While Nazi propaganda tried to turn the 1936 Olympic Games into a show piece of Aryan superiority, one female athlete had a more hands-on encounter with the German fuehrer. 100 metres champion Helen Stephens found out that his response to a good, old Missouri handshake was to be subject to fanny grabbing, pinching and a “full body massage”. Surely this is the most high profile example of sexual harassment to occur at the Olympics, but pales somewhat compared to Hitler’s other crimes. In the area of team sports, the Olympic Games have been slow to include equivalent events for women. The oldest team sports at the Olympics are water polo and football. Both appeared at the 1900 Paris Olympic Games. It would take until 1996 for women’s football to be added to the program and, in an indication of its popularity, 76,481 spectators attended the final. Women’s water polo finally made it to the Olympic program 100 years after the men at the 2000 Sydney Olympics. Even then it was only in June 2000 that the IOC decided the number of women on a team would be the same as the men. Combative sports are another area where the Olympics often have problems with the participation of women. Boxing remains an entirely male sport, despite the first recorded women’s boxing match in the USA taking place in 1876. Laila Ali will not have the chance to emulate her famous gold medal winning father, Muhammad Ali. Four freestyle wrestling events were part of the 2004 Athens Olympic Games, although fourteen wrestling events were open to men. The relatively new Asian martial arts of judo and tae kwon do did have equal numbers of events for men and women at the 2004 Athens Olympic Games. Perhaps the potential for women shedding blood in boxing matches is too much for squeamish male officials. Despite this catalogue of problems, there are two sports where men and women are allowed to compete directly against each other. Equestrian and yachting disciplines have mixed events and merit rather than prejudice is the criteria. Even in the physically demanding endurance section of the equestrian three day event, horse-riders such as Karen Stives, Lucinda Green, Virgina Holgate and Judith Pottinger have matched and often surpassed elite male athletes. Encouragingly, in the last two Olympic Games in Sydney and Athens, women’s participation rates have increased significantly. In Athens, for the first time, the percentage of female athletes rose above 40% of the total and only 5 countries sent teams without any female representation. The team from Afghanistan was led into the Athens Olympic Stadium by flag bearer Rubina Muqimyar, a seventeen year old female sprinter. Having been denied the most basic of rights by the Taliban regime, it’s not surprising that she publicly stated "I will be representing the women of Afghanistan, and Muslim women around the world, who have been deprived of their rights for so long”. The Olympic movement had previously banned Afghanistan because of the Taliban’s gender apartheid and her participation was due to wild card system designed to broaden participation. In contrast to the Comte de Baillet-Latour, it was current President of the IOC, Jacques Rogge, who had insisted that she be the public representative of her country. While equality has not yet been achieved, progress is being made to fulfill the goals of the Olympic Charter. Roll on Beijing 2008! ![]()
Have our cake and eat it: As long as we continue to have our cake and eat it too, people will keep getting fatter. The cyclical spates of fat and carbohydrate bashing, fad diet announcements, new weight-loss pills and health warnings about the rising rates of obesity have done nothing to combat the growing rate of Australian flab. According to the recently released ABS National Health Survey, since 1995 the overweight/obesity rate for men has grown 10 per cent, while for women the rate has increased 8 per cent. We can talk and write about fat all we want—and we do, ad nauseam—but until we change our perception about what, exactly, the problem is, fat will remain predominantly a commercially sellable health scare about food and exercise, rather than an endemic problem centred around attitudes towards food and bodies. Incessant media coverage about overweight issues is exacerbating the problem. It is common wisdom that when you tell a child “no” it makes the forbidden desire all that more appealing. Many adults never grow out of this simple relationship and food has replaced sex as the number one forbidden pleasure. Keep telling us that everything nutritionally valueless but hassle-free is bad and we’ll crave it all the more. Each series of fat superstar photos teaches another swathe of pudgy people to hate their bodies—and they comfort eat their self-hatred to temporary oblivion. Food retail and marketing create another negative closed loop that enables the satiation of craving. In every space of our lives, junk food is not only available, but on display: at school cafeterias, in workplace vending machines, glowing from our television screens and at bakeries, check-out counters and department store aisles. Everywhere our senses are assaulted with the colour and glossy glow of junk food packaging. We probably didn’t even know we felt like some chips until there they were in front of us. Let’s face it, we’re addicted. Eating for enjoyment in and of itself is not the root of all evil. Nor is it the root of all overweight-related health problems. Increasing the expenditure of energy (exercising) can negate the effects of overeating, but most Australians aren’t expending much energy. The contemporary lifestyle replete with sedentary desk job requires only a minimum of daily exercise. This is compounded by a preference for driving instead of walking and hectic days with home cooking low on the priority scale. The convenience and quick-fix rushes provided by sugar, chocolate and fat provide an all-too-easy way of combating boredom and anxiety. When there’s no time to cook and little money to splurge, the local take-away seems the way to go. Cultural change isn’t coming anytime soon. Fast, pre-cooked, chemically-preserved and fake food isn’t becoming any more expensive or less ubiquitous. The problem of obesity is likely to grow. If as a society we aren’t going to relinquish our fast cars and full-time salaries—or the wealth of the processed food and diet industries—then the only hope we have of dealing with our expanding waistlines is to come at the problem from a different angle: by acknowledging the psychological causes of obesity. That Australians are developing more disordered attitudes towards eating is clear. Despite the variety of ways we are reminded how fat we are, it is painfully obvious that some of us are getting skinnier, even disappearing. The ABS health survey, conducted in 2004-2005, found that 10 per cent of 18 to 24 year-olds are underweight. As t-shirts get smaller and trouser waists lower, eating disorder rates are rising alarmingly. While some health experts scream themselves hoarse trying to get the Australian population into low-cal mode, others are tearing their hair out to convince adolescents, gym junkies and society ladies to enjoy food. Half the Australian population is considered overweight or obese, yet approximately 1 out of every 100 young women will develop anorexia and a quarter of anorexic children will be boys. We cannot continue the assault on fat and at the same time encourage people (especially children) to eat. Nor can we market eating and expect dieting to work. The increasing divide between the haves and have-nots in the global marketplace is an indication of systemic social problems rather than a simple lack of money. In the same way the growing divide between the thin and the fat indicates that fat is not just a simple problem of over-consumption. It is a many-factored, culture-wide problem that includes issues of beauty and power, consumerism and addiction, self-esteem and emotional emptiness. Until we acknowledge the psychological repercussions the sale of “skinny” causes and begin talking about disordered eating rather than obesity, we cannot effectively communicate or solve the problem of fatness. As it is we can barely even identify obesity. According to Justin Healey, author of Dieting and Eating Disorders, 45 per cent of women and 23 per cent of men in the healthy weight range perceive themselves to be overweight. The ABS survey found only half of the men who thought they were in a healthy weight range were so, the other half classified as overweight or obese. A quarter of women incorrectly perceived themselves to be of a healthy weight. While newspapers, magazines and television carry on about how fat Australians are, around 1 in 5 people will develop bulimia and 5 per cent of girls suffering from anorexia will die due to the disorder. Overweight/obesity and anorexia/bulimia represent two extremes of a continuum and eating disorders must be discussed in the same breath as obesity. Being obsessive about eating, whether it leads to eating too much or not enough, is primarily about mental health. Fat must stop being such an issue. It is the only way we can all make the choice to eat one piece of cake rather than the whole damn thing—or none of it. Rachel Funari is editor of the young women magazine lip![]()
Campaign Update:
There was a recent success for the pro-choice movement in February when the power to veto RU486 was taken away from the Health Minister. Women politicians united across party lines and successfully demanded that women be given more choice, both reproductive and political. Unfortunately, Tony Abbott would not walk away quietly. Instead, the federal government announced a financial package to support a pregnancy counselling line. This services could be run by religious organisations who will purposely mislead callers and not provide real support. Read more about the issue: Making counselling honest on the abortion option Women Need Legitimate Counselling, Not State-Sponsored Manipulation Let's keep the counsellors honest and true back to index |